In Re Kaygee (Usa) Inc., Debtor, Charter Pacific Bank v. Balbir Singh Tuli

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re KAYGEE (USA) INC., Debtor, CHARTER PACIFIC BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Balbir Singh TULI, Defendant-Appellant, No. 92-55824. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 17, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Balbir Singh Tuli appeals pro se the district court order imposing sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal from the bankruptcy court. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d). We review the imposition of sanctions for an abuse of discretion, Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2138 (1991), and we affirm. 3 On April 10, 1991, the bankruptcy court issued an order terminating the automatic stay resulting from Tuli's filing of an involuntary bankruptcy petition against Kaygee (USA), Inc. ("Bankruptcy Court Order"). On April 17, 1991, Tuli timely filed a notice of appeal to the district court. On…