Frank D. Milligen v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service

24 F.3d 247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank D. MILLIGEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POSTMASTER GENERAL, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 15, 1993. * Decided May 2, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank D. Milligen appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the Postmaster General, in Milligen's action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. We affirm. 3 * Milligen contends that the district court's summary judgment was improper because he established a prima facie case of gender discrimination in the form of a hostile work environment. 1 4 A hostile work environment is shown by "the existence of severe or pervasive and unwelcome verbal or physical harassment because of the plaintiff's membership in a protected class." Sischo-Nownejad v. Merced…