Elizabeth Roll and Lola Roll v. State of Idaho

24 F.3d 248 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elizabeth ROLL and Lola Roll, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF IDAHO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35713. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1994. Decided May 17, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court entered summary judgment and dismissed the claims of appellants Elizabeth Roll and Lola Roll against various defendants. The plaintiffs' claims arose out of a series of allegedly illegal searches of the enclosed curtilage of the Rolls' farm in Canyon County, Idaho. The searches occurred in response to complaints, principally by the Rolls' estranged brothers, of animal neglect occurring on the farm. We affirm. I. 3 The district court properly dismissed the Rolls' civil rights claims for damages against the State of Idaho, the State of Idaho Brand Department, and John Howard under the Eleventh Amendment of the…