Daniel Patrick Rawlins v. Jeanne Olson, Probation Officer Adult Probation Department State of Arizona

24 F.3d 248 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel Patrick RAWLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeanne OLSON, Probation Officer; Adult Probation Department; State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16686. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 21, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Patrick Rawlins appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to state a claim. He contends the district court erred by finding the defendants absolutely immune from suit and by denying his post-judgment motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the dismissal of an action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). Review is limited to the contents of the complaint, and all…