William Clyde Pumphrey v. Jack Potts

24 F.3d 248 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Clyde PUMPHREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack POTTS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16840. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 17, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Clyde Pumphrey, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Pumphrey contends that his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated when the defendants subjected him to a sodium amytal interview for the purpose of obtaining information regarding his criminal history. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and review de novo. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment should be affirmed only if the evidence, read in the light most…