Asuncion B. Ramel, AKA Millares Asuncion Bagoyo v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

24 F.3d 248 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Asuncion B. RAMEL, aka Millares Asuncion Bagoyo, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70891. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 13, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Asuncion B. Ramel, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of her appeal as untimely. Ramel had sought to appeal the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding her deportable as charged and denying her request for a waiver of deportation, or in the alternative, voluntary departure. We dismiss Ramel's petition for lack of jurisdiction. 3 We have jurisdiction to review only final orders of deportation. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). When a petitioner files a motion to reopen before seeking judicial review of an order of deportation,…