Johnny Pattillo v. Michael Singer, Susan N. Wasko

Good Law
24 F.3d 248·1994 WL 155277·73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2107·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199493-15597California850 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 248 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -2107 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Johnny PATTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SINGER, Susan N. Wasko, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 28, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Johnny Pattillo appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Johnny and Odessa 1 Pattillos' ("the Pattillos") 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Pattillo also appeals the denial of the Pattillos' motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, and the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion for abuse of discretion. McCarthy v. May, 827 F.2d 1310 , 1314 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm. 3 The Pattillos filed an action on March 3, 1992 alleging that Michael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.