Lyla L. Thomas v. Garrett Fluid Systems, Inc. And Allied Signal, Inc.

Good Law
24 F.3d 249·1994 WL 192076·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18860
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 199493-16590California498 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 249 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lyla L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARRETT FLUID SYSTEMS, INC. and Allied Signal, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 16, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lyla L. Thomas appeals pro se the district court's orders denying her requests for appointment of counsel in her action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq., and other federal laws. We review for abuse of discretion, Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 In considering whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) to appoint counsel for a pro se plaintiff in a civil action, the district court is required to assess: (1) the plaintiff's financial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.