Lyla L. Thomas v. Garrett Fluid Systems, Inc. And Allied Signal, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
24 F.3d 249 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lyla L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARRETT FLUID SYSTEMS, INC. and Allied Signal, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 16, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lyla L. Thomas appeals pro se the district court's orders denying her requests for appointment of counsel in her action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq., and other federal laws. We review for abuse of discretion, Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. 3 In considering whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) to appoint counsel for a pro se plaintiff in a civil action, the district court is required to assess: (1) the plaintiff's financial…