Southern California Title Co. v. Security Union Title Insurance Co. Chicago Title Insurance Co., (Two Cases) Southern California Title Co. v. Security Union Title Insurance Co. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

24 F.3d 249 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70,762 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TITLE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY UNION TITLE INSURANCE CO.; Chicago Title Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TITLE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SECURITY UNION TITLE INSURANCE CO.; Chicago Title Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-55027, 93-55377 and 93-55378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1994. Decided April 21, 1994. Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Southern California Title Company (SoCal) brought an antitrust action against Security Union Title Co. (Security) and Chicago Title Insurance Co. (Chicago). The district court granted summary judgment against SoCal because it agreed with Security and Chicago that a release executed by SoCal barred the action. The court then awarded some attorneys fees to Security and Chicago. SoCal…