Mitchell R. Tanner v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary, William K. Anderson, H.R. Maar, Chief Personnel Service

24 F.3d 249 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mitchell R. TANNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary, William K. Anderson, H.R. Maar, Chief Personnel Service, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55732, 92-55809. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 20, 1994. Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mitchell R. Tanner appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of the Department of Veterans' Affairs, et al. ("DVA"). Tanner's primary contention is that the DVA violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 701 et seq., by terminating his employment after he suffered a heart attack. Tanner also appeals the district court's denial of his request for oral argument on the summary judgment motion. 3 The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1331 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…