Dawne Stokes v. Elsie Lamma William Rappold Dale Shelton Robert Hovde

24 F.3d 249 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dawne STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elsie LAMMA; William Rappold; Dale Shelton; Robert Hovde, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35733. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided April 28, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dawne Stokes appeals the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 In reviewing the district court's decision, we accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true. Id. Stokes was a deputy clerk in the Pondera County Clerk and Recorder's Office ("Clerk's Office"). According to Stokes, defendant Elsie Lamma made work conditions so oppressive for…