United States v. Ricardo Bautista-Ramos

24 F.3d 250 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo BAUTISTA-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30380. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricardo Bautista-Ramos appeals his convictions imposed following entry of his unconditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm and unlawful possession of a firearm by an illegal alien, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g)(1), 922(g)(5). 3 Counsel for Bautista-Ramos filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified three possible issues for review: (1) whether Bautista-Ramos' wife voluntarily consented to the search of their hotel room, (2) whether the police properly obtained Bautista-Ramos' consent to search his truck, and (3) whether trial counsel had a conflict of interest that…