United States v. Ronald Lee Hale

24 F.3d 250 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Lee HALE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-16904. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 17, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Lee Hale, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 petition. Hale pled guilty to five counts of bank robbery and was sentenced on July 31, 1989 to 87 months imprisonment. He contends the district court erred by denying his claim that United States v. Anderson, 942 F.2d 606 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc), requires modification of his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . After accepting the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and reviewing its conclusions of law de novo, Doganiere v. United States, 914 F.2d 165, 167 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S.…