United States v. Ronald K. Clark

24 F.3d 250 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald K. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10254. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided April 29, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In his second appeal Ronald Clark challenges both his conviction and his sentence. Because his conviction was affirmed in an unpublished disposition on February 1, 1993, his attempt to reargue alleged errors in his trial are frivolous and will be disregarded. 3 We remanded the case for resentencing because of a change in the sentencing guidelines with reference to the effect of possession of a firearm by a felon. See United States v. Sahakian, 965 F.2d 740, 742 (9th Cir.1992). The original sentence was to serve 360 months in custody followed by five years of supervised release. On remand he was sentenced to 235 months in custody and five years…