United States v. William D. Helm, United States of America v. William D. Helm

24 F.3d 250 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William D. HELM, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William D. HELM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30119, 93-30320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1994. * Decided May 4, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion cases, William D. Helm appeals his convictions following jury trial for disposal of household waste on public land and creating a public disturbance or risk in violation of 43 C.F.R. Sec. 8365.1-1(b)(4), 1-4(a)(2). Helm raises three issues for review: (1) the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence; (2) the district court erred by admitting a videotape and photographs into evidence because they were misleading; and (3) the government failed to present sufficient evidence to support his convictions. We have…