United States v. Jose De Jesus Flores-Martinez

24 F.3d 250 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose De Jesus FLORES-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30289. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 16, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose de Jesus Flores-Martinez appeals his conviction following entry of a conditional guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). Martinez was convicted after this court vacated the district court's suppression order in United States v. Flores-Martinez, 972 F.2d 1100 (9th Cir.1992) and remanded for further fact-finding on the motion to suppress. Martinez contends that federal agents violated his Sixth Amendment rights by interrogating him without the presence of counsel after Martinez had requested counsel during previously-dismissed state proceedings on charges arising from the same…