United States v. Terence Albert Nolan

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Terence Albert NOLAN, Petitioner-Appellant. No. 93-35311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Terence Albert Nolan, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Nolan was convicted of making false statements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001 . Nolan contends that: (1) he was denied due process because the district court failed to conduct a hearing on the issue of whether Nolan breached a prior plea agreement; (2) the district court erred in calculating Nolan's sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines; (3) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; and (4) the district court erred in denying his Sec. 2255 motion…