United States v. Michael Kilman

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael KILMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1993. * Decided May 9, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-92-0832-03-JNK; Judith N. Keep, Chief District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Kilman appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess methamphetamine for distribution, possession of methamphetamine for distribution, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 . 3 The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 . I. 4 On June 11, 1992, undercover Drug Enforcement Agent…