United States v. Real Property Located at 2067 S. Palo Verde, Lake Havasu City, Ariz.

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2067 S. PALO VERDE, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, et al., Defendants, Clarence Morrison, Brandon Morrison, and Noma Lee Morrison, Claimants-Appellants. No. 92-17032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 18, 1994. Decided May 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, POOLE and CANBY, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Claimants Morrisons appeal from summary judgment in favor of the government and an order denying a motion for an extension of time and granting the government's motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1345 and 1355(a). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm and remand. 2 The Morrisons contend the district court abused its discretion in denying their motion under Federal Rule of Civil…