United States v. William Rowland, AKA John v. Rettie

Good Law
24 F.3d 251·1994 WL 192436·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 199493-30258California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William ROWLAND, aka John V. Rettie, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30258. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994. Decided May 17, 1994. Before: SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 William Rowland (aka John V. Rettie), a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Rowland contends that the district court erred in imposing a three-year term of supervised release by relying on a non-severable provision of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 since he was not sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Rowland also contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c) by failing to advise him of the nature and effect of a potential term of supervised release when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.