United States v. Humberto Rodriguez-Romero, (Two Cases)

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto RODRIGUEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases) Nos. 92-50720, 93-50183. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1993. May 9, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Humberto Rodriguez-Romero appeals his convictions of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute and bail jumping. Rodriguez alleges that the district court made several errors during trial. He also raises various sentencing issues. We affirm Appellant's convictions, but vacate the sentence imposed and remand to the district court for resentencing. I. 3 Appellant argues that the district court's refusal to continue his trial to hear allegedly exculpatory testimony from codefendant Garcia violated his constitutional right to present a defense and to have a fair trial. Appellant also argues…