United States v. Pedro Martinez-Tinoco, AKA Arturo Morales-Tsintzun, United States of America v. Ismael Duarte

24 F.3d 251 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-TINOCO, aka Arturo Morales-Tsintzun, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael DUARTE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50054, 93-50410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1994. Decided April 26, 1994. 1 Before: WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and REED, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ismael Duarte and Pedro Martinez-Tinoco, aka Arturo Morales-Tsintzun (Morales), appeal from their jury convictions for conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute. Duarte also appeals from his conviction of possession of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime, and the 123-month sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines. Morales also appeals his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. We affirm. Duarte 4 Sufficient evidence…