Oscar Williams, Jr. v. Salvador Godinez
Opinion
Opinion
24 F.3d 252 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Oscar WILLIAMS, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Salvador GODINEZ, et al., Respondent/Appellee. No. 93-15619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 12, 1994. * Decided May 13, 1994. 1 Before: NORRIS, SKOPIL, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Oscar Williams appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A thorough review of the record leads us to conclude that any errors that occurred did not result in an unfair trial or in a miscarriage of justice. See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 1719-20 (1993). We therefore affirm the district court's denial of the petition. 4 1. Rearrest After Grant of Pretrial Habeas Writ 5 Williams contends that the state's alleged failure to comply with state law in recharging him subsequent to his release on a pretrial habeas writ violated his right to due process. In the absence of prosecutorial bad faith,…