United States v. Gustavo Soliz

Good Law
24 F.3d 252·1994 WL 196759·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18992
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199493-30265California633 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 252 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo SOLIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30265. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gustavo Soliz appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). He was also convicted of conspiracy to manufacture, manufacturing and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1), 846 and willfully structuring transactions with a financial institution in violation of 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5324 (3). Soliz contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the firearm conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We will overturn a conviction only if, viewing all the evidence in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.