Hyde & Drath, a Professional Corporation v. Kenneth R. Baker Olivia Decker W.C. Baker Colonial Title Guaranty Company Michael Salter Jay Hinrichs John Murren Contempo Realty, Tungsten Contact Manufacturing Co., Gw Development Corporation, Ltd. v. Kenneth R. Baker, Tungsten Contact Manufacturing Company, World Union Corp., Ltd. Stonehaven Investments, Ltd. v. Kenneth R. Baker

Good Law
24 F.3d 1162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 199492-15863California5,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

24 F.3d 1162 28 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1318 , RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8561 HYDE & DRATH, a Professional Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth R. BAKER, et al.; Olivia Decker; W.C. Baker; Colonial Title Guaranty Company; Michael Salter; Jay Hinrichs; John Murren; Contempo Realty, Defendants-Appellees. TUNGSTEN CONTACT MANUFACTURING CO., et al., Plaintiffs, GW Development Corporation, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth R. BAKER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. TUNGSTEN CONTACT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, World Union Corp., Ltd.; Stonehaven Investments, Ltd.; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kenneth R. BAKER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-15863, 92-15867 and 92-15870. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1993. Decided May 20, 1994. As Amended July 25, 1994. Thomas F. Hyde and Sharon B. Futerman, Hyde & Drath, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Stephen Kaus, Cooper, White & Cooper, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Baker. Gary Nadler, Hirschfield & Nadler, Petaluma, CA, for defendant-appellee Decker. Anthony Cohen, Clement, Fitzpatrick & Kenworthy, Santa Rosa, CA, for defendants-appellees Colonial and Salter. Clayton…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.