United States of America, Ex Rel., Max Killingsworth v. Northrop Corporation

Good Law
25 F.3d 715·94 Daily Journal DAR 6834·1994 WL 197930·28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1522·9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1431
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199492-55863California4,743 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bright, J.

Opinion by Senior Circuit Judge BRIGHT.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed February 2, 1994, is granted. Upon hearing further oral argument and examining supplementary briefs and other materials, the prior opinion of this court filed January 19, 1994, is withdrawn. A revised opinion is attached to this order and is filed as the opinion of this court in this case.

OPINION

Max Killingsworth brought a qui tam action against the Northrop Corporation [Northrop], alleging it defrauded the United States by inflating cost estimates used to support MX missile contract proposals. During an extended course of litigation, the United States declined to exercise its right to intervene under §§ 3730(b)(2) and (c)(3) of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730 [the Act]. Killingsworth and Northrop eventually agreed to a settlement, notified the United States, and moved to dismiss the action. The United States objected to the settlement but still declined to intervene in the proceedings. The district court ultimately dismissed the action without the consent of the United States. The United States then moved in the district court to intervene for purpose of appeal, seeking to challenge the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.