United States v. Francisco Rodriguez-Martinez

Good Law
25 F.3d 797·94 Daily Journal DAR 7330·1994 WL 229741·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12537·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3936
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199491-10220, 93-15232California1,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

We consider the conditions under which a court may depart upward from a statutorily-imposed mandatory minimum sentence.

I

Francisco Rodriguez-Martinez (“Rodriguez”) was convicted of possession with intent to distribute one kilogram of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(l)(B)(ii)(II). He appeals his sentence, contending that the court improperly departed upward under the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

The district court determined that Rodriguez had a base offense level of 26, which it adjusted by a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility to level 24. This adjusted offense level, in conjunction with his criminal history level of III, generated a sentencing range of 63 to 78 months. However, because Rodriguez’s offense carried a statutory minimum 10-year sentence, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(l)(B)(ii), 120 months became the Guidelines sentence. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 5Gl.l(b) (Nov. 1992); United States v. Williams, 939 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.1991). Nevertheless, the court sentenced Rodriguez to 136 months, stating that a sentence above the statutory minimum was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.