Forrester v. City of San Diego

Good Law
25 F.3d 804·94 Daily Journal DAR 7317·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 12543·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3927
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199492-55137California7,339 words

Opinion

Opinion

25 F.3d 804 Michael G. FORRESTER; Michaelene Ann Jenkins; Donna E. Niehouse; Dena A. Niehouse; Nancy H. Scofield; Harold E. Scofield, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal corporation; Donald Fashing; D. Hannan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55137. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1993. Decided June 1, 1994. Lloyd Edward Tooks, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Francis M. Devaney, Deputy City Atty., San Diego, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Opinion by Judge HALL; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD. Before: GIBSON, * HALL, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: 1 Anti-abortion demonstrators who were arrested for trespass and unlawful assembly appeal (1) the district court judgment that the City of San Diego's policy regarding pain compliance arrest techniques was constitutional and (2) the jury verdict that San Diego's police officers did not use excessive force in executing their arrests. Because sufficient evidence supported the jury verdict, we affirm without deciding whether the city's policy authorized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.