United States v. Miguel Ortega-Rodriguez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202221-50156California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50156

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-10140-BAS-

v.

MIGUEL ORTEGA-RODRIGUEZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Ortega-Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 12-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ortega-Rodriguez contends that the district court procedurally erred and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violated due process by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.