Rafael Salas v. Henry Nichols

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202221-16013California265 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL SALAS, No. 21-16013

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-04828-JST

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer; LACY, Correctional Sgt.; HENRY NICHOLS, Correctional Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Rafael Salas appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.