Rafael Salas v. Henry Nichols
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202221-16013California265 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAFAEL SALAS, No. 21-16013
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:17-cv-04828-JST
v.
MEMORANDUM*
CARRAWAY, Correctional Officer; LACY, Correctional Sgt.; HENRY NICHOLS, Correctional Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Rafael Salas appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We…