Noe Raquinio v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202220-16114California347 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOE KIM RAQUINIO, No. 20-16114

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00450-JMS-WRP v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner MEMORANDUM* of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Noe Kim Raquinio appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action challenging the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of

his application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social

Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kildare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.