Estrada

Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202221-15531California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 21-15531

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00535-RM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ESTRADA, named as Nurse Estrada; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing her action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the

Federal Tort Claims Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo questions of mootness. Di Giorgio v. Lee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.