Estrada
Jeremy Pinson v. Estrada
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202221-15531California397 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 21-15531
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:18-cv-00535-RM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ESTRADA, named as Nurse Estrada; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing her action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the
Federal Tort Claims Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo questions of mootness. Di Giorgio v. Lee…