Christopher Serafin v. William C. Earhart Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202220-35147California405 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER SERAFIN, No. 20-35147
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00192-YY
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WILLIAM C. EARHART COMPANY
INC.; CASCADE GENERAL, INC.;
LABORER’S LOCAL UNION 296;
OREGON LABORERS’-EMPLOYERS
PENSION PLAN TRUST,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted July 12, 2022***
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Christopher Serafin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing as time-barred his action alleging violations of the Employee