Christopher Serafin v. William C. Earhart Co.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 202220-35147California405 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER SERAFIN, No. 20-35147

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00192-YY

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM C. EARHART COMPANY

INC.; CASCADE GENERAL, INC.;

LABORER’S LOCAL UNION 296;

OREGON LABORERS’-EMPLOYERS

PENSION PLAN TRUST,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 12, 2022***

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Christopher Serafin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing as time-barred his action alleging violations of the Employee

Retirement Income…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.