Nghiem v. Nec Electronic, Inc.

Good Law
25 F.3d 1437·94 Daily Journal DAR 7547·64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,075·64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1669·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13086
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 199492-16155California2,768 words

Opinion

Opinion

25 F.3d 1437 64 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1669 , 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,075 , 62 USLW 2757 , 1994-1 Trade Cases P 70,604 Peter P. NGHIEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEC ELECTRONIC, INC., a California corporation; NEC Corporation; Japan (Nippon Electric Company), a Japanese corporation; Hiro Hashimoto; H. Yoshizawa, Dr.; Grant Hulse, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted as to Defendants-Appellees Nov. 4, 1993. Submitted as to Plaintiff-Appellant Nov. 4, 1993. Decided June 3, 1994. David H. Tollner, San Jose, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. David J. Murphy and Keith R. Black, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Jose, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges; HATFIELD, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge O'SCANNLAIN. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 In this challenge to an arbitrator's award, we are asked to decide, among other issues, whether the so-called "American Safety doctrine" continues to prevent submission of antitrust claims to arbitration. 2 * Peter Nghiem, an American citizen of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.