Green v. Anderson

Good Law
26 F.3d 95
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199493-15306California182 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 95 Deshawn GREEN, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on behalf of themselves and all others situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Eloise ANDERSON, individually and in her official capacity as Director, California Department of Social Services; California Department of Social Services; and Thomas Hayes, Director, California Department of Finance, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-15306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994. Decided April 29, 1994. Amended June 13, 1994. Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants. Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding. Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F.Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case. 2 This Court's Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words "the preliminary injunction" between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.