Arnold Sayson Isidro Baltazar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
26 F.3d 129·1994 WL 198682·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199492-70826California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arnold Sayson Isidro BALTAZAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70826. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1994. * Decided May 18, 1994. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arnold Baltazar petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's decision finding him deportable as charged and denying his application for a waiver of deportation under Sec. 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction, id. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 * Baltazar argues that the Board erred in refusing to find that the IJ abused his discretion in denying Baltazar's Sec. 212(c) waiver application. 1 We review the Board's decision to deny Sec. 212(c) relief for abuse of discretion. Vargas v. Department of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.