Andrakin v. S.F. Parking & Traffic Com'n

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James William ANDRAKIN, and A Class of Defendants, of Parking Citations, in San Francisco, California, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.F. PARKING & TRAFFIC COMMISSION; Municipal Court of the City & County of San Francisco; the City & County of San Francisco and Pick Your Part Auto Wrecking dba City Tow, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17170. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James William Andrakin appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, see Holden v. Hagopian, 978 F.2d 1115, 1118 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 1 3 To state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 ,…