Michael Alexander Christopher v. James Gomez B.J. Bunnell C/o Gaboa C/o Gabbie C/o Yoder

Good Law
26 F.3d 129·1994 WL 209803·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21753
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 199493-15100California1,601 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Alexander CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ; B.J. Bunnell; C/O Gaboa; C/O Gabbie C/O Yoder, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1994. * Decided May 25, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Allen Christopher, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for preliminary injunction which was filed in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Christopher contends that the district court abused its discretion by finding that neither double-celling him with other inmates, nor delay in his gaining access to the prison law library raised serious legal questions or caused a significant threat of irreparable harm warranting injunctive relief. 1 3 This court will reverse the grant or denial of a preliminary injunction only where the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.