Martiyan Cam v. James L. Rhoades

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martiyan CAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James L. RHOADES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1994. * Decided June 14, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martiyan Cam appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). We review for an abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and we affirm. 1 3 Cam contends that he was deprived of various constitutional rights during criminal proceedings in Oregon state court. In an order filed on January 6, 1994, the district court carefully considered Cam's second and third amended complaints and determined that they were frivolous. We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court's well-reasoned order. 4 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case…