Eva Cardoza Molina, Ana Frances Rocha-Cardoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eva Cardoza MOLINA, Ana Frances Rocha-Cardoza, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70309. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1994. * Decided May 13, 1994. 1 Before: NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA ** , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Eva Cardoza-Molina, together with her daughter Ana Frances Rocha-Cardoza, petition for review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals of their petition for asylum and withholding of deportation. The petitioners have produced no evidence to show that the decision of the Board was unsupported by substantial evidence. Eva Cardoza-Molina specifically testified that the reason that she feared assassination by the Sandinistas was that her husband had been assassinated by them and that she had helped her family to go to Costa Rica together with her brother. These reasons for fearing persecution…