Donald Chan Vladimir Piljak Burton H. Wolfe v. Robert H. Miller, and Luxor Cab Company Local 278 Retail Delivery Drivers, Driver-Salesmen & Helpers

26 F.3d 129 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald CHAN; Vladimir Piljak; Burton H. Wolfe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert H. MILLER, Defendant, and Luxor Cab Company; Local 278 Retail Delivery Drivers, Driver-Salesmen & Helpers, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16139. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994. Decided May 25, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, FERGUSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiffs, who were taxi drivers for DeSoto Cab Company ("DeSoto" or "the cab company"), claim both the cab company and the Teamsters Union breached their duty to the cab drivers by entering into a settlement agreement and then breached the agreement itself by not informing the drivers of its terms. Plaintiffs argue the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") should have pursued an unfair labor practice action against the cab company. They also claim Judge Legge erred by not recusing himself for bias. The…