James Demers, and Louis Loader Donna Loader v. Roncor, Incorporated

Good Law
26 F.3d 130·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21724
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 199493-35033California542 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James DEMERS, et al., Plaintiffs, and Louis Loader; Donna Loader, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RONCOR, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-35033, 93-35034. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1994. Decided May 25, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, SCHROEDER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Class plaintiffs and Louis and Donna Loader appeal the district court judgment and post-trial orders. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 A. The court did not err in finding that the jury determined damages for the total loss of digging rights. 4 We review for abuse of discretion the denial of class plaintiffs' Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to amend the judgment. Floyd v. Laws, 929 F.2d 1390, 1400 (9th Cir.1991). 1 They challenge the court's conclusion that "[i]t was at all times clear at trial that the class was seeking damage for total loss of digging rights on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.