Abel C. Flores v. Ticor Title Insurance Company of California Chicago Title Company

Good Law
26 F.3d 130·1994 WL 227968·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21728
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 199494-15048California1,283 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abel C. FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA; Chicago Title Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15048. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Abel C. Flores appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of his former employer Ticor Title Company, Inc. and Chicago Title Company, Inc. (collectively "the Company") in his employment discrimination action alleging age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-634 , and national origin discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e to 2000e-17 and California state law. Flores contends the district court erred by finding that he failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.