Jeanne Curran v. The Jerome Hotel, Aka: Hotel Jerome Associates, L.P. Dba: Jerome Hotel

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jeanne CURRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JEROME HOTEL, aka: Hotel Jerome Associates, L.P.; dba: Jerome Hotel, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56522. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jeanne Curran appeals the district court's dismissal of her diversity action for personal injuries against defendant Jerome Hotel ("Hotel"). The district court dismissed her action because (1) her action was barred by the California statute of limitations, and (2) the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over the Hotel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. Background 3 On March 5, 1992, Curran filed her complaint for damages in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In her complaint, Curran, a California resident, alleged that on March…