Onie L. Hyde, a Married Woman v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
26 F.3d 130 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -2195 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Onie L. HYDE, a Married Woman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Onie L. Hyde appeals the district court's denial of her motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(2) on the basis of newly-discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 We address first the question of our jurisdiction over this appeal. The government contends that our jurisdiction is limited to review of the district court's denial of Hyde's Rule 60(b)(2) motion and that we may not review the underlying summary judgment. This contention has merit. 4 The district court entered summary judgment for the government on June 7, 1993. Under Fed.R.App.P.…