Frederick L. Green v. Bryn Armstrong Danny D'ArpA Nikki Kinsley, Thomas Chickery the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryn ARMSTRONG; Danny D'Arpa; Nikki Kinsley, Thomas Chickery; the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16673. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 7, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Frederick L. Green appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners alleging that his constitutional rights were violated during his parole revocation proceedings. The district court construed Green's action as a habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and we affirm. 3 To…