Charles Heisen v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc. Emil Kopilovich

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles HEISEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.; Emil Kopilovich, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided June 9, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Heisen appeals pro se the district court's judgment (1) dismissing his Clean Air Act claims for lack of jurisdiction and (2) granting a motion for judgment of default on a counterclaim filed by defendant-appellee Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc. ("PABCO"). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Dismissal of Heisen's Complaint 4 Heisen's complaint alleged that PABCO and Emil Kopilovich, a PABCO employee, had violated the Clean Air Act by submitting improper or fraudulent information to the Clark County Health District, Air Pollution Control Division ("CCHD-APCD"), in order to…