Faramarzi v. Inland Pacific Real Estate, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peador FARAMARZI; Helma Farahnik; Mike Mesut Culha; Bradley William Brunon; Parkhideh Hilda Vessta; Homa Ohebsion; Edward Gregorian; Ala Gregorian; Seveta Gregorian, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INLAND PACIFIC REAL ESTATE, INC.; La Jolla Pacific Equities, Defendants and W. Harold Sellers, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-56406. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1994. * Decided June 3, 1994. Before: HUG, WIGGINS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Harold Sellers appeals the entry of default and the entry of a default judgment in the amount of $1,099,954. He claims that he never received notice of the case and that he was not given an opportunity to present his case. Because we find that Sellers acted culpably, we affirm the entry of the default; because he was not given notice of the application of the default judgment and because no hearing was held on the matter of the…