In re Hurt

Good Law
26 F.3d 130·1994 WL 224263·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 199492-16538California211 words

Opinion

Opinion

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Norma J. HURT, Debtor. Milton G. PACE; Nevada-West Systems, Inc.; Zeco, Inc.; Robertson Wood Products, Inc.; Intermountain Wood Products, Inc.; Canco, Inc.; Sunway Systems, Inc.; Perco, Inc.; Kachina Plywood, Inc.; Andrew B. Spain, Appellants, v. Norma J. HURT, Appellee. No. 92-16538. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994. Decided May 26, 1994. 1 Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 ORDER * 3 Milton G. Pace's motion to allow filing of "Supplement To: Appellant's Reply Brief" is denied. 4 The judgment of the bankruptcy court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's Memorandum Decision. We reverse, however, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's sanctions against all Appellants for bringing a frivolous appeal except the sanction against Appellant Milton G. Pace. We affirm the sanction imposed on Appellant Pace. * This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.