Dowdell v. City of Riverside

26 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth G. DOWDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RIVERSIDE; Arthur Sims, Riverside Superior Court Clerk; Valeria Valencia, Exhibits Clerk; Neal Booth, Supervisor; Matthew J. Marrnell; Roberts & Morgan, Attorneys at Law Firm; S. Hays, Deputy; County of Riverside, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55493. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 24, 1994. * Decided May 27, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth G. Dowdell appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The district court dismissed on the alternative grounds that Dowdell's action was barred by the statute of limitations and that Dowdell's allegations simply did not support a federal claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We agree…